Skip to content

Source reconstruction · Proposed

Gandhi 2.0

An AI reconstruction requested by David Joseph

Published 22 October 2026
Release 2026-10-22.1

Question 4 of 6 · The change

What will we change?

The change, and what it should lead to.

Statements: 4
Connections: 2
Open questions: 3

How to read it. Read from the bottom up: from each change to the effects it should have.

ChangeExpected effectPossible harmProposedandJoint conditions

Expected effectDestructive conflict costs and unnecessary hierarchical intervention fall while fair treatment, independent competence and member influence are retained. Proposed
- ↑ contributes to Proposed all of these together
  - ChangeTest member-controlled AI conflict guidance with voluntary use, human support, a workable exit and competence checked without AI. Proposed
  - ChangeMembers establish confidentiality, fair grievance handling and independent comparison before live use. Proposed
Possible harmConflict guidance may suppress justified grievances even when satisfaction improves. Proposed
- ↑ contributes to Proposed
  - ChangeTest member-controlled AI conflict guidance with voluntary use, human support, a workable exit and competence checked without AI. Proposed shown above

Where this comes from

In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a future reality tree. How a commons works →